Mason Greenwood, Manchester United and soccer’s darkish double requirements


“Intense internal deliberation,” Manchester United known as it in one thing of a holding assertion. Mason Greenwood’s future is the topic of reasonably greater than that; it’s a scenario with appreciable and doubtlessly colossal implications, on and off the pitch. It will have an effect on, and doubtless harm, United’s status. It will in all probability give their varied sponsors a query of whether or not to terminate their relationship with the membership. It definitely may deliver a backlash towards fully innocent gamers of their ladies’s staff.

At some stage, an announcement will come whether or not Greenwood’s contract is terminated or whether or not he’ll play for United once more. The membership mentioned the “fact-finding” stage of their investigation into his conduct is full and that chief govt Richard Arnold will make the ultimate determination; and but the idea is that the choice is made and that Greenwood will keep.

This is an ethical, industrial and footballing concern: even maybe the world’s greatest membership have appeared ill-equipped to take care of a difficulty of its magnitude and sensitivity.

The naked info are that in January 2022, disturbing audio emerged of a voice, assumed to be Greenwood’s, as a person tried to pressure himself upon a lady. Greenwood was subsequently arrested and later charged with tried rape, assault occasioning precise bodily hurt and controlling and coercive behaviour. The expenses had been dropped in February 2023 by the Crown Prosecution Service when new materials emerged and key witnesses withdrew their involvement. United then opened their inside investigation. Since then, Greenwood has remained suspended by the membership, unable to play or prepare.

United can argue a six-month investigation is an indication of how thorough it has been: they are saying they’ve spoken to loads of individuals and thought of proof that’s not within the public area. Yet concluding the investigation was at all times prone to be a problematic half: maybe it could have been simpler if it was achieved in June, within the low season.

Instead, it has been mishandled. United had communicated privately that they might reveal their determination earlier than the beginning of their marketing campaign. It stored being put again: initially slated for 4 August, it was later mentioned it could not be made on final Wednesday or Thursday, then not on Friday, both.

But a part of the method was that United wanted to speak with what they termed key stakeholders: they embrace sponsors and industrial companions, followers’ teams and their ladies’s staff. And the truth that a number of the gamers are in Australia, making an attempt to win the World Cup, appeared to have handed United by and led to recommendations the choice was of their fingers after which sadly inevitable social medial abuse.

With the Women’s World Cup closing on Sunday and the prospect of the gamers having time without work earlier than returning to United, it means an announcement could not come till September.

But, with every step, it appears ever extra possible that they’re looking for a option to clarify that Greenwood will return to the membership. There is little doubt that holding Greenwood would deliver outrage, and never merely exterior Old Trafford; definitely some employees could be sad and it could be fully comprehensible if members of the Women’s aspect had been too (that United solely fashioned a Women’s staff in 2018 confirmed a lesser dedication than a lot of their rivals displayed).

Eight of the boys’s squad have joined since Greenwood final performed however he’s not thought to have been universally well-liked within the dressing room when he was concerned.

Meanwhile, there are different points to think about. The alleged sufferer can’t be named for authorized causes; her anonymity is vital, although it additionally means the image seen to the broader world is incomplete.

United are but to disclose the findings of their investigation. One discovering, particularly, ought to be key in a society the place there must be some scope for rehabilitation of the repentant: is Greenwood sorry or simply sorry he received caught?

(Getty Images)

He and United can argue that he was not convicted of any prison offence, although that doesn’t robotically render him an harmless man. They can say he has suffered a punishment by already shedding 18 months of a comparatively quick profession.

They would in all probability be proper in the event that they concluded that nearly some other membership would preserve Greenwood; disagreeable as that suggestion can be, it’s a actuality of soccer. Even a membership of United’s wealth – with an annual turnover of round £600m and having spent about £170m on signings this summer season – could be reluctant to let a footballer with the expertise to be value £100m go.

Their house owners, the Glazer household, have hardly ever appeared aligned with what followers want. The supervisor, Erik ten Hag, has a staff who scored too few league objectives final season. Meanwhile, Greenwood, nonetheless solely 21, is United’s youngest goalscorer in Europe; solely Norman Whiteside and George Best scored extra for United as youngsters.

Does any of that matter? Many would say no. In an evaluation of his character, it definitely doesn’t. But there’s a double normal in soccer. Were a steward, a kitman or a press officer to have behaved as Greenwood did, it could be a easy determination to dismiss them for gross misconduct. But footballers are handled in another way and United are wrestling with the query of the right way to justify that.



Leave a Comment